ABSTRACT
Introduction: Individuals living with a complex or rare chronic disease live a life where the use of healthcare services and selfcare are part of their quotidian and even of their identity. They may, as a result, experience significant psychological distress. Yet, specialized healthcare providers (HCPs) who manage their care are often ill‐equipped to respond to the emotional or social dimensions of their patients’ illness and intervene in a meaningful way.
Methods: In this paper, we report on the process and outcomes of a living ethics project, structured as a living lab. The living lab followed a five‐phase methodology, each phase involving various research methods (e.g., semi‐structured interviews, group interviews) and oriented toward distinct tasks: identifying the issue (phase 1: problem identification), deepening understanding (phase 2: problematization), co‐developing interventions (phase 3: ideation), implementing them (phase 4: enactment), and evaluating the interventions and the overall process (phase 5: evaluation).
Results: Phase 1 led to the identification of neglected psychological distress of patients as an important ethical issue. Phase 2 exhibited causes and consequences of psychological distress. Phase 3 led to the co‐development of: (1) an electronic medical appointment preparation form for patients, aimed at guiding medical consultations based on their specific needs, facilitating communication, and opening discussions about mental health; (2) a directory of mental health resources intended for clinic staff to better equip them in addressing the mental health of patients; and (3) mental health awareness posters with catchy slogans strategically placed throughout the clinic to raise awareness about mental health and encourage open discussions. Phase 4 led to the implementation of these interventions and phase 5 to their evaluation. All interventions were evaluated positively as well as the participatory nature of the research project while many core aspects of living ethics were furthered.
Conclusion: This project shows that directly engaging stakeholders in ethics research, by addressing the moral issues they deem significant and working with them to tackle those issues rather than conducting research on them, can lead to tangible, unexpected, and positive moral and clinical outcomes, even within a short timeframe and with limited resources.