Unité de recherche en éthique pragmatique de la santé

Notre équipe a identifié des publications clés portant sur le pragmatisme et l’éthique pragmatique. Vous pourrez ainsi consulter les ressources qui suivent pour mieux comprendre ces approches théoriques.

 

  1. Bogossian A, Gorter JW, Racine E. Protocol for a scoping review about ethics in transition programmes for adolescents and young adults with neurodisabilities. BMJ open. 2018;8(8):e020914 (Figure 1 seulement). En savoir plus
  2. Racine E. Can moral problems of everyday clinical practice ever be resolved? A proposal for integrative pragmatist approaches. Dans: Ethics in child health – Principles and cases in neurodisability. Mac Keith Press, London; 2016. p. 33-48. En savoir plus
  3. Racine E. Pragmatism and the contribution of neuroscience to ethics. Dans: Solymosi T, Shook JR, éds. Neuroscience, neurophilosophy and pragmatism: Brains at work with the world. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2014. 30 p. (Se concentrer sur les pages 19-30). En savoir plus
  4. Racine E, Cascio MA, Montreuil M, Bogossian A. Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment. Theoretical medicine and bioethics. 2019 Aug 1;40(4):253-7. En savoir plus
  5. Miller FG, Fletcher JC, Fins JJ. Clinical pragmatism: a case method of moral problem solving. Dans: Fletcher JC, Lombardo, Paul A., Faith Marshall, Mary, Miller, Franklin G., éd. Introduction to clinical ethics. Haggerstown, Maryland: University Publishing Group; 1997:21-34.
  6. Gouinlock J. The moral writings of John Dewey. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books; 1994. (Se concentrer sur l’introduction du livre).
  7. Miller FG, Fins JJ, Bacchetta MD. Clinical pragmatism: John Dewey and clinical ethics. The journal of contemporary health law and policy. Fall 1996;13 9(1):27-51.
  8. Aiguier G, Loute, Alain. L’intervention éthique en santé: un apprentissage collectif. Nouvelles pratiques sociales. 2016;28(2):158-172.
  9. Shook JR. Pragmatism, pluralism, and public democracy. Revue française d’études américaines. 2010;124(2):11 28.
  10. Biesta G. Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. Dans: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, éds. SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2 éd. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2010:95-118. (Se concentrer sur les pages 12-21).
  11. Racine E, Cascio MA. The false dichotomy between empirical and normative bioethics. AJOB empirical bioethics. 2020 Jan 2;11(1):5-7. En savoir plus
  12. Foucart J. Pragmatisme et transaction. La perspective de John Dewey. Pensée plurielle. 2013;33-34(2):73 84.
  13. Pappas GF. John Dewey’s ethics: Democracy as experience. Indianapolis:: Indiana University Press; 2008.
  14. Fesmire S. John Dewey & moral imagination. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press; 2003.